Dunham v. Gillis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Dunham v. Gillis

8 Mass. 462

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1812

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 8 Mass. 462 (Dunham v. Gillis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunham v. Gillis, 8 Mass. 462 (Mass. 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This point is settled by the case of Tippet vs. Hawkey, (3) which was not cited in the argument. Here the consideration was several. The parties contributed severally and in different proportions to the joint stock. Their covenants were several, and each has his several remedy for a breach. The admission of the indenture in evidence at the trial was therefore Draper.

Let judgment he entered on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This point is settled by the case of Tippet vs. Hawkey, (3) which was not cited in the argument. Here the consideration was several. The parties contributed severally and in different proportions to the joint stock. Their covenants were several, and each has his several remedy for a breach. The admission of the indenture in evidence at the trial was therefore Draper.

Let judgment he entered on the verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Mass. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunham-v-gillis-mass-1812.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack