Dunham v. Gillis

8 Mass. 462
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This point is settled by the case of Tippet vs. Hawkey, (3) which was not cited in the argument. Here the consideration was several. The parties contributed severally and in different proportions to the joint stock. Their covenants were several, and each has his several remedy for a breach. The admission of the indenture in evidence at the trial was therefore Draper.

Let judgment he entered on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunham v. Gillis, 8 Mass. 462 (Mass. 1812).

8 Mass. 462 (Dunham v. Gillis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Street Trust Co. v. Hall
41 N.E.2d 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Farwell v. Wilcox
175 P. 936 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Gray v. Buck
7 A. 16 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1886)
Stone v. Wendover
2 Mo. App. 247 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1876)
Capen v. Barrows
67 Mass. 376 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1854)
Wadsworth v. Manning
4 Md. 59 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1853)
Hosack's Executors v. Rogers
25 Wend. 313 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)