Dunham v. Cades

115 N.J. Eq. 290
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 2, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 115 N.J. Eq. 290 (Dunham v. Cades) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunham v. Cades, 115 N.J. Eq. 290 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Yice-Chancellor Davis, in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Hehee, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Paekee, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 N.J. Eq. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunham-v-cades-nj-1934.