Dunham Lumber Co. v. Tumlin Lumber Co.

111 S.E. 586, 28 Ga. App. 424, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 564
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 1, 1922·No. 12800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

This case is controlled by the ruling of the Supreme Coort in Clark v. Ganson, 144 Ga. 544 (87 S. E. 670), wherein it was held that “ the mere filing in the office of the cleric of the superior court of a paper called an amendment, but without any allowance by the judge or order permitting it to be filed, does not amount to amending the petition.” No amendment to the petition having been “ made ” within the time allowed by the previous order of the judge, the judgment dismissing the petition and overruling the motion to reinstate must stand

Affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunham Lumber Co. v. Tumlin Lumber Co., 111 S.E. 586, 28 Ga. App. 424, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 564 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 586 (Dunham Lumber Co. v. Tumlin Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kumpe v. Hudgins
149 S.E. 56 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)