Dunham Lumber Co. v. Tumlin Lumber Co.
This text of 111 S.E. 586 (Dunham Lumber Co. v. Tumlin Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is controlled by the ruling of the Supreme Coort in Clark v. Ganson, 144 Ga. 544 (87 S. E. 670), wherein it was held that “ the mere filing in the office of the cleric of the superior court of a paper called an amendment, but without any allowance by the judge or order permitting it to be filed, does not amount to amending the petition.” No amendment to the petition having been “ made ” within the time allowed by the previous order of the judge, the judgment dismissing the petition and overruling the motion to reinstate must stand
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 S.E. 586, 28 Ga. App. 424, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunham-lumber-co-v-tumlin-lumber-co-gactapp-1922.