Dune Alpin Farm Corp. v. Assessor of East Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dune Alpin Farm Corp. v. Assessor of East Hampton

143 A.D.2d 748, 533 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10092

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 143 A.D.2d 748 (Dune Alpin Farm Corp. v. Assessor of East Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dune Alpin Farm Corp. v. Assessor of East Hampton, 143 A.D.2d 748, 533 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

—In consolidated proceedings pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated September 10, 1987, which granted the petitioner’s motion to consolidate four proceedings to review real property tax assessments for the tax years 1983/1984 through 1986/1987.

[749]*749Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contentions of the appellants, we find that the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the consolidation of four tax certiorari proceedings to review the assessments placed upon the same real property in successive tax years (see, CPLR 602 [a]; RPTL 710; Megyesi v Automotive Rentals, 115 AD2d 596; Chinatown Apts. v New York City Tr. Auth., 100 AD2d 824; Mideal Homes Corp. v L & C Concrete Work, 90 AD2d 789). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In consolidated proceedings pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated September 10, 1987, which granted the petitioner’s motion to consolidate four proceedings to review real property tax assessments for the tax years 1983/1984 through 1986/1987.

[749]*749Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contentions of the appellants, we find that the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the consolidation of four tax certiorari proceedings to review the assessments placed upon the same real property in successive tax years (see, CPLR 602 [a]; RPTL 710; Megyesi v Automotive Rentals, 115 AD2d 596; Chinatown Apts. v New York City Tr. Auth., 100 AD2d 824; Mideal Homes Corp. v L & C Concrete Work, 90 AD2d 789). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D.2d 748, 533 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dune-alpin-farm-corp-v-assessor-of-east-hampton-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack