Dundee Woolen Mills v. Edison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dundee Woolen Mills v. Edison

86 S.E. 414, 17 Ga. App. 245, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 318

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 1, 1915

Docket6202

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 414 (Dundee Woolen Mills v. Edison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dundee Woolen Mills v. Edison, 86 S.E. 414, 17 Ga. App. 245, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 318 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, an assignment of error on the overruling of a motion for a non-suit will not be considered, if the case proceeds to a verdict, and-the defendant excepts to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it.

2. It is never error for a judge to refuse to direct a verdict.

3. The court did not err in allowing the amendment adding a new count to the plaintiff’s petition; it did not set up a new cause of action, but only alleged a breach of the same contract in a different manner, and was not otherwise objectionable.

4. There was some evidence to sustain the verdict, and no material error appears in the charge of the court. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI