Dundas v. Bladen
4 Rawle 463, 1834 Pa. LEXIS 21
Opinion
It is always safe to adhere to the plain words of a statute. To impute a speculative intent to the legislature in respect to cases that were probably not actually in their view, would lead to uncertainty, and in the end contrariety of decision. They have declared in positive terms that the plaintiff shall not refer without the defendant’s consent before the ensuing term ; and we see no reason to make the present case an exception.
Rule of reference and proceedings on it set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dundas v. Bladen, 4 Rawle 463, 1834 Pa. LEXIS 21 (Pa. 1834).
4 Rawle 463 (Dundas v. Bladen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells v. Scott
1 Miles 125 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1836)