Duncovich v. Ripley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Duncovich v. Ripley

261 A.D. 870, 25 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 870 (Duncovich v. Ripley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duncovich v. Ripley, 261 A.D. 870, 25 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of Montgomery county on September 12, 1940, in favor of the defendant on the verdict of the jury of no cause of action and awarding costs to defendant, and from an order of the trial justice denying the motion by plaintiff to set aside the verdict. The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the trial justice are against the weight of evidence and the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial granted. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Sehenek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of Montgomery county on September 12, 1940, in favor of the defendant on the verdict of the jury of no cause of action and awarding costs to defendant, and from an order of the trial justice denying the motion by plaintiff to set aside the verdict. The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the trial justice are against the weight of evidence and the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial granted. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Sehenek, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 870, 25 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncovich-v-ripley-nyappdiv-1941.