DUNCOMBE v. State

19 So. 3d 442, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15184, 2009 WL 3230452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2009·No. 5D09-1981·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued a Spencer 1 show cause order directing Roger Dwayne Duneombe to show cause “why he should not be denied further pro se access to this Court for any proceeding to further attack the convictions and sentences” in the underlying case. Having carefully considered Mr. Duncombe’s response, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, we prohibit Roger Dwayne Duneombe from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Bre-vard County Circuit Court case number 05-2004-CF-051320-AXXX-XX. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning this case. Any further pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“enough is enough”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2007); Simpkins v. State, 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
1

. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUNCOMBE v. State, 19 So. 3d 442, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15184, 2009 WL 3230452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

19 So. 3d 442 (DUNCOMBE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Simpkins v. State
909 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)