Duncombe v. Richards
11 N.W. 186, 47 Mich. 646, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 489
This text of 11 N.W. 186 (Duncombe v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Duncombe v. Richards, 11 N.W. 186, 47 Mich. 646, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 489 (Mich. 1881).
Opinion
Mcmdctmus. The taxation of commissioners’ fees in gross was improper. Besides they should have been taxed in the court below. The charges for briefs, if the several amounts were not too large, may stand. The charges of $10 for copy and $10 for testimony of Biehards should only have been allowed on a proper affidavit of disbursements.
Matter referred back to taxing officer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 N.W. 186, 47 Mich. 646, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncombe-v-richards-mich-1881.