Duncan v. Walker

531 U.S. 991, 121 S. Ct. 480
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 2000·No. No. 00-121·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan v. Walker, 531 U.S. 991, 121 S. Ct. 480 (2000).

531 U.S. 991 (Duncan v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

EGGLESTON v. WAHL
W.D. Pennsylvania, 2024
RG Premier Bank v. Alvarado (In Re Alvarado)
463 B.R. 200 (D. Puerto Rico, 2011)
Conception v. Brown
794 F. Supp. 2d 416 (W.D. New York, 2011)
Neverson v. Farquharson
366 F.3d 32 (First Circuit, 2004)
Carillo v. Rhode Island
212 F.R.D. 56 (D. Rhode Island, 2002)
David C. Smith v. W.A. Duncan, Warden
297 F.3d 809 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Jackery B. White v. Robert Klitzkie
281 F.3d 920 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Charles C. Delaney III v. James Matesanz
264 F.3d 7 (First Circuit, 2001)
Cervantes v. Pliler
27 F. App'x 763 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Jimenez v. Walker
166 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. New York, 2001)
Delaney v. Matesanz
First Circuit, 2001
Crawley v. Catoe
257 F.3d 395 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Melendez v. McCoy
146 F. Supp. 2d 416 (S.D. New York, 2001)
McGuinness v. Pepe
150 F. Supp. 2d 227 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden
246 F.3d 1277 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Locke v. Saffle
237 F.3d 1269 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)