Duncan v. Waldman, No. Cv 90 0045173 S (Aug. 17, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 7318
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 17, 1993·No. No. CV 90 0045173 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Practice Book Section 24, the court finds that the plaintiff has demonstrated good cause for the admission of the out-of-state attorney. Conversely, the defendants failed to put forward "some legitimate state interest [which would be] thwarted by admission of the out-of-state attorney." See Herrmann v. Summer Plaza Corporation, 201 Conn. 263, 267-270 (1986). Because "[a] litigant's request to be represented by counsel of his choice . . . should be respected by the court," the plaintiff's motion for admission pro hac vice is granted.

BY THE COURT,

William M. Shaughnessy Judge, Superior Court CT Page 7319

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan v. Waldman, No. Cv 90 0045173 S (Aug. 17, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 7318 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 7318 (Duncan v. Waldman, No. Cv 90 0045173 S (Aug. 17, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrmann v. Summer Plaza Corp.
513 A.2d 1211 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1986)