Duncan v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Duncan v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1023, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1921

United States Customs Court·Decided March 20, 1968·No. No. P68/165; protest 63/10129 (B) (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of carburetor parts, dedicated to use on or with internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, [1024]*1024Turner & Co. v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 306, Abstract 62130), tbe claim of tbe plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of carburetor parts, dedicated to use on or with internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, [1024]*1024Turner & Co. v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 306, Abstract 62130), tbe claim of tbe plaintiffs was sustained.

Duncan v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1023, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1921 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

60 Cust. Ct. 1023 (Duncan v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.