Duncan v. Sun Fire Insurance
2 Wend. 625
Opinion
The plaintiff being under an order to stay proceedings, irregularly noticed his cause for trial, and the subsequent order of the court allowing him to proceed to the trial of his cause, notwithstanding the rule for a commission, does not cure the irregularity. Until the vacatur of that rule, the plaintiff was not at liberty to proceed in his cause. The motion is granted with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duncan v. Sun Fire Insurance, 2 Wend. 625 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).
2 Wend. 625 (Duncan v. Sun Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Troy Carriage Works v. Muxlow
16 Misc. 561 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Devlin v. Mayor of New York
9 Daly 331 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1880)