Duncan v. State

67 S.W.2d 863, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duncan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Tex. Crim. 335 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 31, 1934·No. No. 16467·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Duncan v. State, 67 S.W.2d 863, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

67 S.W.2d 863 (Duncan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.