Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Duncan v. State

Duncan v. State

241 S.W.3d 441, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1742, 2007 WL 4481441
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 26, 2007
DocketWD 67621
StatusPublished

This text of 241 S.W.3d 441 (Duncan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duncan v. State, 241 S.W.3d 441, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1742, 2007 WL 4481441 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Lucille Duncan appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 Motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Duncan argues that because her trial attorney failed to call two witnesses, she did not receive adequate representation. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Duncan’s trial attorney acted as a reasonably competent lawyer in deciding not to call either witness.

Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fields v. State
241 S.W.3d 441 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 S.W.3d 441, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1742, 2007 WL 4481441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-state-moctapp-2007.