Duncan v. State

661 So. 2d 911, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10685, 1995 WL 601374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duncan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 616 So. 2d 140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1995·No. No. 95-03459·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Duncan appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for jail credit time. We affirm. In listing the judicial acts to be reviewed, however, Duncan for the first time asserted that he is entitled to credit for jail time from September 26, 1994, to November 16,1994. This time period is not listed in his motion, is not reflected on the jail credit time log, and is not addressed by the trial court. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to any subsequent motion seeking credit for the time alleged in the statement of judicial acts.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan v. State, 661 So. 2d 911, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10685, 1995 WL 601374 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 911 (Duncan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.