Duncan v. Sherman

Fourth Circuit

Duncan v. Sherman

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 4, 2003

Docket03-6231

StatusUnpublished

This text of Duncan v. Sherman (Duncan v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duncan v. Sherman, (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6231

MICHAEL A. DUNCAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR SHERMAN, Jail Dentist,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 03-6351

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-1869-AM)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Duncan appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his motion to amend. We have reviewed

the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See

Duncan v. Sherman, No. CA-02-1869-AM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2003

& entered Jan. 22, 2003; filed Feb. 12, 2003 & entered Feb. 13,

2003). We deny Duncan’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI