Duncan v. Richardson
34 Ala. 117
Opinion
The defendant engaged in the trial of this case before the. justice of the peace, and succeeded in establishing a defense on the merits. After the case was carried by appeal to the circuit court, he moved to dismiss the suit, because’no security for costs bad been given by the plaintiff; he being a non-resident when the suit was commenced. The defendant had waived his right to make the motion. — Weeks v. Napier, at present term; Thompson v. Clopton, 31 Ala. 647.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duncan v. Richardson, 34 Ala. 117 (Ala. 1859).
34 Ala. 117 (Duncan v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capital City Water Co. v. State ex rel. Macdonald
105 Ala. 406 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1894)
Shuttleworth v. Dunlop
34 N.J. Eq. 488 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)
Heflin v. Rock Mills Manufacturing & Lumber Co.
58 Ala. 613 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)