Duncan v. Renfrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Duncan v. Renfrow

97 S.E.2d 685, 246 N.C. 197, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 382

DecidedMay 1, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E.2d 685 (Duncan v. Renfrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duncan v. Renfrow, 97 S.E.2d 685, 246 N.C. 197, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 382 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only assignment of error brought forward in appellant’s brief, to wit, the denial by Judge Morris at February Civil Term, 1955, of his motion for judgment on the pleadings, is manifestly without merit. The sole basis for said motion was the alleged insufficiency of the allegations of the original petition. Appellant ignores the fact that, by leave of court, the original petition was amended, and that the trial was on the issues raised by the amended pleadings. The [200]*200amended petition, obviously sufficient, was not and is not challenged by appellant.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only assignment of error brought forward in appellant’s brief, to wit, the denial by Judge Morris at February Civil Term, 1955, of his motion for judgment on the pleadings, is manifestly without merit. The sole basis for said motion was the alleged insufficiency of the allegations of the original petition. Appellant ignores the fact that, by leave of court, the original petition was amended, and that the trial was on the issues raised by the amended pleadings. The [200]*200amended petition, obviously sufficient, was not and is not challenged by appellant.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E.2d 685, 246 N.C. 197, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-renfrow-nc-1957.