Duncan v. Ratcliff
161 P. 1174, 63 Okla. 19, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1369
Opinion
From the motion to dismiss filed herein by defendant in error, attached to which is the affidavit of the clerk of the district court, it appears that the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted has been fully satisfied and discharged. Hence the questions presented here have ceased to exist and have become moot.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duncan v. Ratcliff, 161 P. 1174, 63 Okla. 19, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1369 (Okla. 1916).
161 P. 1174 (Duncan v. Ratcliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.
1995 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1995)
Grand River Dam Authority v. Eaton
1990 OK 133 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)
Hart v. Jett Enterprises, Inc.
744 P.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.
1946 OK 198 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)
Stucki v. Oklahoma City
1923 OK CR 17 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1923)