Duncan v. Pryor
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60766 Summary Calendar __________________
WENDELL DUNCAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ESTELL PRYOR; J. BROWN,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 95-CV-331-SA - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Wendell Duncan appeals the dismissal of his civil rights
complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The
district district court determined that Duncan's complaint failed
to satisfy Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994), i.e.
because a judgment in his favor would imply the invalidity of his
conviction and he failed to show that "his complaint has not been
`reversed, expunged, invalidated, or impugned by the grant of a
writ of habeas corpus.'" R. 28. The district court denied
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-60766 -2-
Duncan's complaint as frivolous under § 1915(d). We have
reviewed the record, the district court's order, and the
appellant's brief. We affirm essentially on the reasoning of the
district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duncan v. Pryor (Duncan v. Pryor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.