Duncan v. Pryor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 15, 1996·No. 95-60766·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60766 Summary Calendar __________________

WENDELL DUNCAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ESTELL PRYOR; J. BROWN,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 95-CV-331-SA - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wendell Duncan appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The

district district court determined that Duncan's complaint failed

to satisfy Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994), i.e.

because a judgment in his favor would imply the invalidity of his

conviction and he failed to show that "his complaint has not been

`reversed, expunged, invalidated, or impugned by the grant of a

writ of habeas corpus.'" R. 28. The district court denied

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-60766 -2-

Duncan's complaint as frivolous under § 1915(d). We have

reviewed the record, the district court's order, and the

appellant's brief. We affirm essentially on the reasoning of the

district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan v. Pryor, (5th Cir. 1996).

Duncan v. Pryor (Duncan v. Pryor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)