Duncan v. Nassau Electric Railroad
This text of 139 A.D. 917 (Duncan v. Nassau Electric Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the remittitur of the Court of Appeals, ordered that the judgment appealed, from be reversed and a new trial be granted, costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff stipulate to reduce the fee damage to the sum of §1,875, and the rental damage to the sum of §1,125, and- if she so stipulate, judgment affirmed, without costs. Woodward, Jenks. Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 A.D. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-nassau-electric-railroad-nyappdiv-1910.