Duncan v. Miro

Fourth Circuit

Duncan v. Miro

48 F. App'x 898

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2002·No. 02-6664·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gene M. Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Miro, No. CA-01-2410-2-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gene M. Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Miro, No. CA-01-2410-2-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Duncan v. Miro, 48 F. App'x 898 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

48 F. App'x 898 (Duncan v. Miro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related