Duncan v. McKenzie

Fourth Circuit

Duncan v. McKenzie

670 F. App'x 119

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2016·No. No. 16-6728·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Duncan appeals the district court’s order granting, defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Duncan v. McKenzie, No. 1:15-cv-00736-GLR, 2016 WL 1597103 (D. Md. filed Apr. 20, 2016, and entered Apr. 21, 2016).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Duncan appeals the district court’s order granting, defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Duncan v. McKenzie, No. 1:15-cv-00736-GLR, 2016 WL 1597103 (D. Md. filed Apr. 20, 2016, and entered Apr. 21, 2016).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Duncan v. McKenzie, 670 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 119 (Duncan v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related