Duncan v. Laury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Duncan v. Laury

243 A.D. 792, 278 N.Y.S. 715

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 792 (Duncan v. Laury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duncan v. Laury, 243 A.D. 792, 278 N.Y.S. 715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dismissing the first four causes of action stated in the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The case should be tried so that the facts may be disclosed. (See Foreman v. Foreman, 251 N. Y. 237; Fraw Realty Co. v. Natanson, 261 id. 396; Flower City Brewing Co. v. Edwards, 190 App. Div. 203.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing the first four causes of action stated in the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The case should be tried so that the facts may be disclosed. (See Foreman v. Foreman, 251 N. Y. 237; Fraw Realty Co. v. Natanson, 261 id. 396; Flower City Brewing Co. v. Edwards, 190 App. Div. 203.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 792, 278 N.Y.S. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-laury-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack