Duncan v. Gordon

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duncan v. Gordon. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F. App'x 543
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2007·No. 07-7296·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7296

JIMMY DUNCAN, a/k/a Jimmy L. Duncan,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

N. GORDON, Sergeant, Lee Correctional Institution; JANE DOE, a/k/a NFN Slade, Nurse, Lee Correctional Institution; JANE DOE, a/k/a NFN Robinson, Nurse, Lee Correctional Institution; OFFICER ANDERSON, NFN, Lee Correctional Institution; OFFICER DUBOSE, NFN, Lee Correctional Institution; OFFICER BRUNSON, NFN, Lee Correctional Institution; SERGEANT ROBERTS, a/k/a NFN Robertson, NFN, Lee Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:06-cv-00396-MBS)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James, III, LEE, ERTER, WILSON, JAMES, HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Duncan appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and a subsequent order

denying his motion to alter or amend judgment and motion to stay.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Duncan v. Gordon, No. 8:06-cv-00396-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29,

2007; filed July 11, 2007 & entered July 12, 2007). We further

deny Duncan’s motions to authorize preparation of transcript at

government expense and for default judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan v. Gordon, (4th Cir. 2007).

Duncan v. Gordon (Duncan v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related