Duncan v. Gardner

California Supreme Court

Duncan v. Gardner

46 Cal. 24

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·No. No. 3,808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The petitioner is not entitled to the patent, under section thirty-five hundred and nineteen of the Political Code, because there is no offer to surrender the certificate of purchase; nor is he entitled, under section two of the Act of March 27th, 1872, because he has not produced the Sheriff’s deed to the whole of the tract originally purchased by Miller.

Application for the writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The petitioner is not entitled to the patent, under section thirty-five hundred and nineteen of the Political Code, because there is no offer to surrender the certificate of purchase; nor is he entitled, under section two of the Act of March 27th, 1872, because he has not produced the Sheriff’s deed to the whole of the tract originally purchased by Miller.

Application for the writ denied.

Duncan v. Gardner, 46 Cal. 24 (Cal. 1873).

Pincite

46 Cal. 24 (Duncan v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related