Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court

2007 UT 18, 156 P.3d 792, 570 Utah Adv. Rep. 74, 2007 Utah LEXIS 19, 2007 WL 286279
Utah Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 2007·No. Nos. 20051009, 20060203·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

NEHRING, Justice:

T1 This opinion pertains to two petitions brought under Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 65B. We have consolidated the two petitions because both parties ask for essentially the same relief-the vacation of the July 10, 2002 supplemental order entered in favor of Brigham Young University (BYU) and a cessation of collection activities by BYU against petitioners. In light of our holding in Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc., 2007 UT 17, 156 P.3d 782, the petitions are granted and the July 10, 2002 supplemental order is vacated.

I 2 Chief Justice DURHAM, Justice PARRISH, and Judge ATHERTON concur in Justice NEHRING's opinion. 83 Having disqualified themselves, Associate Chief Justice WILKINS and Justice DURRANT do not participate herein; Judge JUDITH S.H. ATHERTON sat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court, 2007 UT 18, 156 P.3d 792, 570 Utah Adv. Rep. 74, 2007 Utah LEXIS 19, 2007 WL 286279 (Utah 2007).

2007 UT 18 (Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lambdin
2015 UT App 176 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2015)
State v. LoPrinzi
2014 UT App 256 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2014)
State v. Lee
2014 UT App 4 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2014)