Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court

Utah Supreme Court

Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court

2007 UT 18, 156 P.3d 792, 570 Utah Adv. Rep. 74, 2007 Utah LEXIS 19, 2007 WL 286279

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 2, 2007

DocketNos. 20051009, 20060203

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2007 UT 18 (Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duncan v. Fourth Judicial District Court, 2007 UT 18, 156 P.3d 792, 570 Utah Adv. Rep. 74, 2007 Utah LEXIS 19, 2007 WL 286279 (Utah 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

NEHRING, Justice:

T1 This opinion pertains to two petitions brought under Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 65B. We have consolidated the two petitions because both parties ask for essentially the same relief-the vacation of the July 10, 2002 supplemental order entered in favor of Brigham Young University (BYU) and a cessation of collection activities by BYU against petitioners. In light of our holding in Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc., 2007 UT 17, 156 P.3d 782, the petitions are granted and the July 10, 2002 supplemental order is vacated.

I 2 Chief Justice DURHAM, Justice PARRISH, and Judge ATHERTON concur in Justice NEHRING's opinion. 83 Having disqualified themselves, Associate Chief Justice WILKINS and Justice DURRANT do not participate herein; Judge JUDITH S.H. ATHERTON sat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NEHRING, Justice:

T1 This opinion pertains to two petitions brought under Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 65B. We have consolidated the two petitions because both parties ask for essentially the same relief-the vacation of the July 10, 2002 supplemental order entered in favor of Brigham Young University (BYU) and a cessation of collection activities by BYU against petitioners. In light of our holding in Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc., 2007 UT 17, 156 P.3d 782, the petitions are granted and the July 10, 2002 supplemental order is vacated.

I 2 Chief Justice DURHAM, Justice PARRISH, and Judge ATHERTON concur in Justice NEHRING's opinion. 83 Having disqualified themselves, Associate Chief Justice WILKINS and Justice DURRANT do not participate herein; Judge JUDITH S.H. ATHERTON sat.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2007 UT 18, 156 P.3d 792, 570 Utah Adv. Rep. 74, 2007 Utah LEXIS 19, 2007 WL 286279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-fourth-judicial-district-court-utah-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack