Duncan v. Duncan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Duncan v. Duncan

236 S.W.3d 666, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2007 WL 3146047

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 2007

DocketED 89227

StatusPublished

This text of 236 S.W.3d 666 (Duncan v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duncan v. Duncan, 236 S.W.3d 666, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2007 WL 3146047 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Don 0. Duncan (hereinafter, “Father”) appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution of his marriage to Donna M. Duncan (hereinafter, “Mother”). Father raises six points on appeal, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to child custody and support, imputation of income to Mother, property distribution, the award of attorneys’ fees to Mother, and the amount and duration of maintenance awarded to Mother.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal. The judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record. Wood v. Wood, 193 S.W.3d 307, 310 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Don 0. Duncan (hereinafter, “Father”) appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution of his marriage to Donna M. Duncan (hereinafter, “Mother”). Father raises six points on appeal, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to child custody and support, imputation of income to Mother, property distribution, the award of attorneys’ fees to Mother, and the amount and duration of maintenance awarded to Mother.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal. The judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record. Wood v. Wood, 193 S.W.3d 307, 310 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 S.W.3d 666, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2007 WL 3146047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-duncan-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack