Duncan v. Duncan

89 S.E. 486, 145 Ga. 424, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 351
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 6, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 486 (Duncan v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duncan v. Duncan, 89 S.E. 486, 145 Ga. 424, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 351 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. Where a party litigant in the trial court made a motion for new trial, and, while it was pending, sued out a direct bill of exceptions to this court, assigning error upon the final decree, the writ of error will be dismissed on motion. The case can not be brought to this court while it is pending in the trial court.

2. While the record shows that the motion for new trial was made before the bill of exceptions was sued out, and that it was dismissed some time after the case had been brought to the Supreme Court by writ of error, the order of dismissal can not be altered or shown by affidavit to have been one entered nunc pro tunc, so as to have the effect of a dismissal made before the bill of exceptions was sued out. Kelly & Jones Co. v. Moore, 125 Ga. 382 (54 S. E. 118).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darden v. Roberts
19 S.E.2d 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Grahl v. Dorsey
193 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Jones v. Naftel Dry Goods Co.
155 S.E. 510 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Newton v. Roberts
135 S.E. 505 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Earnest v. State
97 S.E. 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Earnest v. State
97 S.E. 672 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 486, 145 Ga. 424, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-duncan-ga-1916.