Duncan v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
This text of 47 F.2d 1082 (Duncan v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles E. DUNCAN, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Oscar E. Waer, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for petitioner.
*1083 G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William Cutler Thompson and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., both of Washington, D. C. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Stanley Suydam, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F.2d 1082, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca2-1931.