Duncan v. Centralia Coal Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Duncan v. Centralia Coal Co.

199 Ill. App. 255

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 17, 1916·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Mines and minerals, § 185*—when verdict properly directed. A verdict is properly directed for the defendant in an action hy the. representative of an employee for the employee’s death, where the duty to give warning to deceased of a movement of a car, and negligence in operation which are the basis of the action, are not shown to exist.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Mines and minerals, § 185*—when verdict properly directed. A verdict is properly directed for the defendant in an action hy the. representative of an employee for the employee’s death, where the duty to give warning to deceased of a movement of a car, and negligence in operation which are the basis of the action, are not shown to exist.

Duncan v. Centralia Coal Co., 199 Ill. App. 255 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

199 Ill. App. 255 (Duncan v. Centralia Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.