Duncan v. Carter & Bros.

7 Ky. Op. 261, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 543
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 29, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ky. Op. 261 (Duncan v. Carter & Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duncan v. Carter & Bros., 7 Ky. Op. 261, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 543 (Ky. Ct. App. 1873).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

A bill of exceptions, in order to be filed and to form a part of the history of a case, must be signed by the judge who presided at the trial, and filed with the pleadings. In case the judge refuses to allow and sign the bill of exceptions presented by the party excepting, provisions are made for having one signed by by-standers. Sec. 367, Civ. Code.

In this case, theo paper copied in the transcript before us as or for a bill of exceptions, is not signed by the judge nor by bystanders, and we are not authorized to regard it as a bill of exceptions, or to recognize it as forming any part of the record. There is nothing before us, therefore, to inform us of the history of the proceedings, or that any error was committed by the presiding judge.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ky. Op. 261, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-carter-bros-kyctapp-1873.