Duncan v. Board of Supervisors

64 Miss. 38
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 Miss. 38 (Duncan v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duncan v. Board of Supervisors, 64 Miss. 38 (Mich. 1886).

Opinion

ARNOLD, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It was not necessary that the original note should have been lodged with the justice of the peace before process issued. A copy was sufficient. Code, § 2196. If the motion in the circuit court to dismiss because the original note was not filed before process issued was not overruled, it should have been. If it were necessary to have filed the original note in the circuit court befóle judgment was taken thereon, we must presume, in the absence of a bill of exceptions showing the contrary, that it was done.

The failure to make disposition of the case as to the other defendants before judgment was entered as to appellant -was not excepted to in the lower court, and under § 1433 of the Code the judgment cannot be disturbed here on that account.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hambrick v. Dent
70 Miss. 59 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Miss. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-board-of-supervisors-miss-1886.