Duncan v. Allman

386 So. 2d 6, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1979
DocketNo. 78-1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 386 So. 2d 6 (Duncan v. Allman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duncan v. Allman, 386 So. 2d 6, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate a final judgment filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). We have examined the record and find that the defendant/appellant’s affidavit filed in support of this motion does not contain facts sufficient to support relief under Rule 1.540(b). In addition, no record of the hearing on the motion has been filed with this court and we are advised by appellate counsel for the parties that no court reporter was present at the hearing. We note that appellate counsel was not trial counsel. The order below is, therefore, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tompkins v. Kraemer
402 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 So. 2d 6, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duncan-v-allman-fladistctapp-1979.