Duncan, Liquidator v. Martin

152 So. 16, 113 Fla. 717, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1720
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 12, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal here is from a final decree in a case instituted by way of a creditor’s bill, the purpose of which was to set aside alleged fraudulent conveyances of an insolvent debtor. The correctness of the decree, appealed from depends upon whether or not there is evidence sufficient to support the decree. We find in the record substantial evidence to support the decree and as we cannot say that the conclusions of the Chancellor drawn from the evidence are clearly erroneous, the decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan, Liquidator v. Martin, 152 So. 16, 113 Fla. 717, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1720 (Fla. 1934).

152 So. 16 (Duncan, Liquidator v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.