Duncan Coffee Co. v. Haynes

129 S.W.2d 1163, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1180
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 1939·No. No. 3830.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*1164 HIGGINS, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The propositions submitted in the appellant’s brief in substance are that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie cause of action against the defendant and there is a fatal variance between the contract of employment pleaded and that proved. These propositions present no ground for reversal for it was shown, and the Court found, the defendant to be a Texas corporation with a representative or local agent in Lamar County. This finding fixed the venue as being properly laid in said county under Art. 1995, Sect. 23, R.S. Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. Wells 121 Tex. 397, 48 S.W.2d 978, 981; De Shong Motor Freight Lines v. North Texas Coach Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 108 S.W.2d 766.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duncan Coffee Co. v. Haynes, 129 S.W.2d 1163, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1180 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

129 S.W.2d 1163 (Duncan Coffee Co. v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Aid Life v. Self
140 S.W.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)