Dunbar v. Washington Foundry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dunbar v. Washington Foundry

59 A. 434, 210 Pa. 58, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 836

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 4, 1904

DocketAppeal, No. 163

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 A. 434 (Dunbar v. Washington Foundry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunbar v. Washington Foundry, 59 A. 434, 210 Pa. 58, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 836 (Pa. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question on which this case turns is one of fact, whether the addition to the Foundry Company’s building to enable it [61]*61to make steel castings, was a “ substantial addition ” within the Act of June 4, 1901, P. L. 481, so as to give the lien claimants who furnished material for its construction, a preference in the distribution of the fund. The auditor’s finding to that effect was approved by the court and we have not been convinced that they were in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question on which this case turns is one of fact, whether the addition to the Foundry Company’s building to enable it [61]*61to make steel castings, was a “ substantial addition ” within the Act of June 4, 1901, P. L. 481, so as to give the lien claimants who furnished material for its construction, a preference in the distribution of the fund. The auditor’s finding to that effect was approved by the court and we have not been convinced that they were in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A. 434, 210 Pa. 58, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-v-washington-foundry-pa-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack