Dunbar v. Washington Foundry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dunbar v. Washington Foundry

59 A. 434, 210 Pa. 58, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 836

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 4, 1904·No. Appeal, No. 163·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question on which this case turns is one of fact, whether the addition to the Foundry Company’s building to enable it [61] to make steel castings, was a “ substantial addition ” within the Act of June 4, 1901, P. L. 481, so as to give the lien claimants who furnished material for its construction, a preference in the distribution of the fund. The auditor’s finding to that effect was approved by the court and we have not been convinced that they were in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question on which this case turns is one of fact, whether the addition to the Foundry Company’s building to enable it [61] to make steel castings, was a “ substantial addition ” within the Act of June 4, 1901, P. L. 481, so as to give the lien claimants who furnished material for its construction, a preference in the distribution of the fund. The auditor’s finding to that effect was approved by the court and we have not been convinced that they were in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Dunbar v. Washington Foundry, 59 A. 434, 210 Pa. 58, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 836 (Pa. 1904).

Pincite

59 A. 434 (Dunbar v. Washington Foundry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related