Dunbar v. State
This text of 842 So. 2d 244 (Dunbar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terrell Dunbar challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Dunbar argues that his sentence as a habitual felony offender is illegal based on Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).1 We affirm the decision of the trial court because Dunbar does not affirmatively allege that he received a minimum mandatory sentence under section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2001), and was therefore affected by the amendments contained within chapter 99 188. Dunbar is therefore not entitled to relief under Taylor.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
842 So. 2d 244, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4753, 2003 WL 1823515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.