Dunbar v. State

741 So. 2d 1197, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12524, 1999 WL 743874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dunbar v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 688 So. 2d 993
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 1999·No. No. 98-2831·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court granted appellant, Rodney Dunbar’s, petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking a belated appeal. Upon the appointment, the public defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In the circuit court this appellant entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced as a habitual offender for possession of cocaine (94-4393 CF) and for burglary of a dwelling (94-1001 CF 10A). We affirm the judgments but remand for correction of appellant’s sentence for possession of cocaine.

The state has filed a concession of error and we agree that the trial court committed error by sentencing appellant as a habitual offender for possession of cocaine. See Stubbs v. State, 676 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Reeves v. State, 659 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); § 775.084(1)(a) 3, Fla. Stat. (1993). As in Stubbs the error may be harmless when considered with the other sentence imposed but we remand for the trial court to correct the habitualization for possession of cocaine to avoid any future errors.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

STONE, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunbar v. State, 741 So. 2d 1197, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12524, 1999 WL 743874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

741 So. 2d 1197 (Dunbar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Reeves v. State
659 So. 2d 1259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Stubbs v. State
676 So. 2d 532 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)