Dunbar v. Metts

451 F. App'x 287
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2011·No. No. 11-6716·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Dunbar appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. Because Dunbar may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir.2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunbar v. Metts, 451 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2011).

451 F. App'x 287 (Dunbar v. Metts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related