Dunbar v. Lindenberger
3 Va. 169
This text of 3 Va. 169 (Dunbar v. Lindenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dunbar v. Lindenberger, 3 Va. 169 (Va. 1812).
Opinion
pronounced the opinion of the Court, that, although the appellant acknowledged the action of the appellees, generally, yet he not having confessed a judgment for arty particular sum, it was incompetent for the Court to supply that defect, and assess the damages. The judgment was therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, that the writ of inquiry might be executed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Va. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-v-lindenberger-va-1812.