Dunbar v. Johnson

108 Mass. 519
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gray, J.

Although the accounting together is a sufficient consideration to support a count upon an account stated, the defendant is not precluded from pleading and proving that the whole claim was founded in an illegal transaction. Thomas v. Hawkes, 8 M. & W. 140. Cocking v. Ward, 1 C. B. 858, 870. Kennedy v. Brown, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 677. Rundlett v. Weeber, 3 Gray, 263. In the present case, it is found as a fact that the account stated was founded upon sales of intoxicating liquors made in this Commonwealth in violation of law, and it does not appear that the account included any lawful items. It was therefore rightly ruled that the plaintiff could not recover.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunbar v. Johnson, 108 Mass. 519 (Mass. 1871).

108 Mass. 519 (Dunbar v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milliken v. Warwick
28 N.E.2d 224 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Murphey v. Springs & Co.
200 F. 372 (Fifth Circuit, 1912)
Peeples v. Yates
40 So. 996 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)
Mayberry v. Cook
54 P. 95 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
McKay v. Myers
47 N.E. 98 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
O'Bryan v. Fitzgerald
48 Ark. 487 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Goodwin v. Clark
65 Me. 280 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)