Dunbar v. Eisenstein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Dunbar v. Eisenstein

201 Ill. App. 487, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 745

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 10, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,737

StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ill. App. 487 (Dunbar v. Eisenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunbar v. Eisenstein, 201 Ill. App. 487, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 745 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 1752*—when judgment affirmed. Where the trial court refused to allow the defendants’ counterclaim for rent alleged to be due them from the plaintiff under a lease, which the defendants did not set up in their abstract of record on appeal, a judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed, the court holding that it would not go to the record to correct an abstract or to supply omissions in order to reverse a judgment. 2. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*—when evidence sufficient to sustain disallowance of counterclaim. Evidence in an action for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants, wherein the defendants sought to counterclaim for rent alleged to be due them from the plaintiff under a lease, held to justify a judgment for the plaintiff and a disallowance of the counterclaim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 1752*—when judgment affirmed. Where the trial court refused to allow the defendants’ counterclaim for rent alleged to be due them from the plaintiff under a lease, which the defendants did not set up in their abstract of record on appeal, a judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed, the court holding that it would not go to the record to correct an abstract or to supply omissions in order to reverse a judgment. 2. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*—when evidence sufficient to sustain disallowance of counterclaim. Evidence in an action for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants, wherein the defendants sought to counterclaim for rent alleged to be due them from the plaintiff under a lease, held to justify a judgment for the plaintiff and a disallowance of the counterclaim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ill. App. 487, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-v-eisenstein-illappct-1916.