Dunbar v. Baker

104 Mass. 211
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 104 Mass. 211 (Dunbar v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunbar v. Baker, 104 Mass. 211 (Mass. 1870).

Opinion

Morton, J.

The question presented in this case is a very narrow one. The defendant having been defaulted in the superior court at October term 1869, the court ordered that judgment for the plaintiffs should be entered at the end of the term. This order took effect on the last day of the term, and the plaintiffs were then entitled to judgment. The paper filed by the defendant in the clerk’s office, not brought to the notice of the court and not acted on, could not operate to vacate the order of judgment, or to affect the duty of the clerk to enter the judgment of record. The order of the superior court at January term 1870, which is appealed from, was in substance an order directing its clerk to complete his record according to the original order of the court, and according to the facts of the case. It was not erroneous, and cannot be revised by this court. If the defendant has lost any rights, it is by his own loches in not properly presenting his motion for a continuance, and obtaining an adjudication thereon before judgment. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hopkins v. Harris
203 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Gaston Electric Co. v. American Construction Co., Inc., United States
146 N.E.2d 362 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)
Home Finance Trust v. Rantoul Garage Co.
14 N.E.2d 153 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co.
175 N.E. 78 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Berry Clothing Co. v. Shopnick
249 Mass. 459 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Creditors National Clearing House, Inc.
130 N.E. 111 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
American Wood Working Machinery Co. v. Furbush
79 N.E. 770 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Gray v. Chase
68 N.E. 676 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Gilchrist v. Cowley
63 N.E. 912 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Dalton-Ingersoll Co. v. Fiske
55 N.E. 468 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Brown v. J. & E. Stevens Co.
52 Conn. 110 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1884)
Bowen v. Eichel
91 Ind. 22 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Holland v. Martin
123 Mass. 278 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)
Hickcock's Sons v. Bell
46 Tex. 610 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)
Ray v. Wight
119 Mass. 426 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 Mass. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-v-baker-mass-1870.