Dunbar-Dukate Co. v. Celeste Sugar Co.
275 U.S. 487, 48 S. Ct. 33
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 24, 1927
DocketNo. 44
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 275 U.S. 487 (Dunbar-Dukate Co. v. Celeste Sugar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dunbar-Dukate Co. v. Celeste Sugar Co., 275 U.S. 487, 48 S. Ct. 33 (1927).
Opinion
The motion to substitute party for defendant in error is denied for the reason that the absence of a substantial federal question requires the Court to grant the motion to dismiss on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miller & Lux, Inc. v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.
8 P.2d 560 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 U.S. 487, 48 S. Ct. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunbar-dukate-co-v-celeste-sugar-co-scotus-1927.