Dunaway v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dunaway v. State

681 So. 2d 741, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5630, 1996 WL 284267

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 1996

DocketNo. 95-00042

StatusPublished

This text of 681 So. 2d 741 (Dunaway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dunaway v. State, 681 So. 2d 741, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5630, 1996 WL 284267 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Dunaway challenges several conditions of probation that were not orally pronounced by the trial court. We affirm the two conditions involving the possession of weapons and firearms and the use of intoxicants to excess. These are general conditions of probation that do not have to be pronounced at sentencing. See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996). We strike that portion of condition (12) which requires Dunaway to pay for random drug testing. This is a special condition of probation which must be orally pronounced. Swinton v. State, 670 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects the. probation order is affirmed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Dunaway challenges several conditions of probation that were not orally pronounced by the trial court. We affirm the two conditions involving the possession of weapons and firearms and the use of intoxicants to excess. These are general conditions of probation that do not have to be pronounced at sentencing. See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996). We strike that portion of condition (12) which requires Dunaway to pay for random drug testing. This is a special condition of probation which must be orally pronounced. Swinton v. State, 670 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects the. probation order is affirmed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

681 So. 2d 741, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5630, 1996 WL 284267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunaway-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack