Dunahue v. Kelley

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

REGINALD DUNAHUE ADC #106911 PLAINTIFF

Vv. No. 2:18-cv-103-DPM-PSH

WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Harris’s partial recommendation, Ne 67, and overrules Dunahue’s objections, Ne 71-72. FED.R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Courts must view prisoners’ requests for injunctive relief “with great caution because judicial restraint is especially called for in dealing with the complex and intractable problems of prison administration.” Goff v. Harper, 60 F.3d 518, 520 (8th Cir. 1995) (quotation omitted). Viewed with that caution, Dunahue’s motion doesn’t show that irreparable harm is likely without a preliminary injunction. It is therefore denied. No 64. So Ordered. Lh gr D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 10 Mary 20/9