Dumsta v. Partridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dumsta v. Partridge

51 A.D.2d 991, 381 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11741

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover a broker’s commission, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated February 24, 1975, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The record on this appeal demonstrates that plaintiffs were not entitled to a broker’s commission for the sale by defendant Pike, to defendant Partridge, of her shares of stock in Horizon Properties, Inc. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a broker’s commission, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated February 24, 1975, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The record on this appeal demonstrates that plaintiffs were not entitled to a broker’s commission for the sale by defendant Pike, to defendant Partridge, of her shares of stock in Horizon Properties, Inc. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Dumsta v. Partridge, 51 A.D.2d 991, 381 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 991 (Dumsta v. Partridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.