Dumsta v. Partridge
This text of 51 A.D.2d 991 (Dumsta v. Partridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a broker’s commission, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated February 24, 1975, in favor of defendants, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The record on this appeal demonstrates that plaintiffs were not entitled to a broker’s commission for the sale by defendant Pike, to defendant Partridge, of her shares of stock in Horizon Properties, Inc. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 A.D.2d 991, 381 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumsta-v-partridge-nyappdiv-1976.