Dumpson v. Pavlou

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dumpson v. Pavlou

16 A.D.2d 671, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 671 (Dumpson v. Pavlou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dumpson v. Pavlou, 16 A.D.2d 671, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for a stay of the enforcement of a support order pending appeal therefrom, granted on condition that, within 10 days after entry of the order hereon, appellant shall file an undertaking for $1,000, with corporate surety, that during the pendency of such appeal he will pay the amount directed to be paid (by said order) to the Family Court Division, Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Queens County, for the support of Elizabeth Paellides, the person in whose behalf this proceeding is being prosecuted. Motion by appellant to dispense with the printing of all exhibits, granted; the originals to be submitted on the argument of the appeal. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for a stay of the enforcement of a support order pending appeal therefrom, granted on condition that, within 10 days after entry of the order hereon, appellant shall file an undertaking for $1,000, with corporate surety, that during the pendency of such appeal he will pay the amount directed to be paid (by said order) to the Family Court Division, Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Queens County, for the support of Elizabeth Paellides, the person in whose behalf this proceeding is being prosecuted. Motion by appellant to dispense with the printing of all exhibits, granted; the originals to be submitted on the argument of the appeal. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 671, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumpson-v-pavlou-nyappdiv-1962.